What is pgvector?

pgvector is an open source extension for PostgreSQL that enables the storage, querying, and indexing of high-dimensional vectors within a PostgreSQL database. It effectively transforms PostgreSQL into a vector database, allowing users to perform vector similarity searches and integrate these capabilities directly into their existing database infrastructure.

pgvector is open source and actively maintained, with a growing community and support for various programming languages and frameworks through SDKs and libraries (e.g., Python, .NET, Java).

Vectors are numerical arrays representing text, images, audio, and more, which are central to applications like semantic search, recommendation engines, and generative AI. Traditionally, using these vectors at scale required specialized vector databases or external services. pgvector solves this by integrating vector capabilities into the widely-used PostgreSQL ecosystem.

Key features and capabilities of pgvector include:

  • Vector storage: pgvector introduces a dedicated data type for storing dense vector data, allowing for efficient management of embeddings and other high-dimensional data directly within PostgreSQL tables.
  • Vector similarity search: It supports various distance metrics for calculating vector similarity, including L2 (Euclidean) distance, inner product, and cosine distance. This enables efficient retrieval of similar items based on vector representations.
  • Indexing and performance: pgvector integrates with PostgreSQL’s existing indexing mechanisms and query planner, supporting both exact and approximate nearest neighbor searches. It can leverage indexes like HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) for faster retrieval, particularly for large datasets.
  • Seamless integration: As a PostgreSQL extension, pgvector integrates seamlessly with existing PostgreSQL instances, eliminating the need for separate data stores or complex data transfer processes when incorporating vector capabilities into applications.

Use cases of pgvector include AI and machine learning applications that rely on vector embeddings, such as recommendation systems, content-based filtering, image search, and natural language processing, where finding similar items or content based on their vector representations is crucial.

This is part of a series of articles about vector databases

Key features and capabilities of pgvector

1. Vector storage

pgvector introduces a new vector data type to PostgreSQL, enabling the storage of high-dimensional vectors as native columns. This makes it easy to associate embeddings with rows in your existing tables, such as attaching text embeddings to user profiles or image vectors to media records. Vectors are stored as fixed-length arrays of floating-point numbers, and the vector dimensions must be specified at column creation time. This explicit sizing allows PostgreSQL to allocate storage efficiently and validates data integrity at insertion, reducing the risk of corrupt or malformed vectors in your dataset and improving PostgreSQL performance.

Because vectors are now a native type, you can perform familiar SQL operations like SELECT, UPDATE, and JOIN directly on tables with vector columns. This direct integration eliminates the need for separate vector databases or complex ETL pipelines to copy data into specialized stores. It also enables consistent, atomic transactions across both structured and unstructured data, making it easier to synchronize updates, enforce constraints, and run analytics queries.

2. Vector similarity search

pgvector provides built-in operators for efficient similarity search, supporting widely-used distance metrics that power most real-world AI applications. You can search for the closest vectors to a given query using L2 (Euclidean), inner product, or cosine similarity. These operators allow you to express nearest neighbor queries directly in SQL, enabling vector ranking and filtering without leaving the PostgreSQL environment. For example, retrieving the top-k most semantically similar documents or images becomes a single SQL query.

Beyond basic nearest neighbor search, pgvector supports filtering and re-ranking by combining similarity scoring with SQL WHERE clauses. This enables hybrid queries that factor in both vector similarity and structured data conditions (such as user permissions or recency). Developers can optimize retrieval workflows for common use cases like product recommendations or knowledge base search.

3. Indexing and performance

Efficient search across millions of vectors depends on strong indexing, and pgvector addresses this with algorithms adapted for PostgreSQL. The extension provides two main index types: IVFFlat, which partitions the vector space to limit search scope, and HNSW, a graph-based structure offering high efficiency for approximate nearest neighbor queries. These indexes help reduce query latency and enable real-time experiences even as vector collections grow in size and complexity.

Choosing the right index type offers flexibility: IVFFlat generally provides faster build times and compact indexes, making it suitable for periodic batch updates or smaller datasets. HNSW excels for low-latency, high-recall applications where vector queries are frequent and timeliness is crucial. Both can be tuned for recall and performance, allowing teams to strike the balance that matches their application’s SLA. Because indexes are built within PostgreSQL, they inherit transactionality and backup/restore support, simplifying database lifecycle management.

4. Integration

PostgreSQL’s ecosystem includes a variety of extensions, management tools, and hosting options. This integration means existing workflows, such as replication, backup, and role-based access control, automatically extend to vector data. You can use familiar SQL migrations and schema management tools to evolve your vector schemas just as you do with other fields, reducing onboarding friction and operational risk.

Frequent updates to pgvector ensure compatibility with new PostgreSQL releases and cloud platforms. Whether you’re running Postgres on-premises, with managed services, or inside containerized environments, pgvector operates smoothly with minimal extra setup. It also plays nicely with extensions for full-text search or time-series data.

Tutorial: Getting started with pgvector

To begin using pgvector, you first need to install the extension and enable it in your PostgreSQL database. These instructions are adapted from the PostgreSQL documentation.

1. Install pgvector

On Linux and macOS, clone the repository and build the extension:

pgvector tutorial terminal screenshot

pgvector tutorial terminal screenshot

You will need development headers installed for PostGres Server. Please use the following command:

On Windows, ensure C++ support is enabled in Visual Studio, then run the following in the “x64 Native Tools Command Prompt for VS”:

Alternatively, you can install pgvector using package managers like Homebrew, APT, PGXN, or via Docker and conda-forge. Many hosted Postgres providers include pgvector preinstalled.

2. Enable the extension

Enable pgvector in your database with the following SQL command:

pgvector tutorial terminal screenshot

You need to run this once per database where you want to use pgvector.

3. Create a table with a vector column

Define a table with a vector column by specifying the number of dimensions:

You can also add a vector column to an existing table:

4. Insert and query vectors

Add vector data to your table:

pgvector tutorial terminal screenshot

To find the vectors closest to a query vector using L2 (Euclidean) distance:

pgvector tutorial terminal screenshot

You can also use other distance metrics:

  • <#>: inner product (returns negative value)
  • <=>: cosine distance
  • <+>: L1 distance

For example, to compute cosine similarity:

pgvector tutorial terminal screenshot

5. Use SQL for updates, deletes, and aggregates

Update vector values:

Delete a row:

Compute the average of all vectors:

Group averages by category:

pgvector tutorial terminal screenshot

Tips from the expert

Perry Clark

Perry Clark

Professional Services Consultant

Perry Clark is a seasoned open source consultant with NetApp. Perry is passionate about delivering high-quality solutions and has a strong background in various open source technologies and methodologies, making him a valuable asset to any project.

In my experience, here are tips that can help you better operationalize pgvector in production systems:

  1. Use hybrid retrieval plans (SQL + ANN): Combine vector KNN with structured prefilters (e.g., tenant_id, language, recency) so the ANN index only scans a narrowed candidate set. This usually beats “vector-only” scans by an order of magnitude.
  2. Adopt a two-stage recall → precision pipeline: First run a fast ANN query for top-N (HNSW/IVFFlat), then re-rank those candidates with exact distance and any business features (popularity, permissions, freshness). Do the re-rank in SQL to keep transactions atomic.
  3. Partition by access pattern, not just size: Range- or list-partition on fields that correlate with query filters (tenant, locale, product line). Build per-partition vector indexes so the planner prunes entire shards at plan time, slashing latency under multi-tenant load.
  4. Tune HNSW/IVFFlat with workload-aware knobs: Benchmark ef_search / M (HNSW) or lists / probes (IVFFlat) against your real query lengths and recall targets. Store these settings alongside the index definition and automate re-tuning when embedding models change.
  5. Warm the working set intentionally: After deploys or failovers, prewarm hot pages for both the table and the vector index (e.g., with pg_prewarm) so the first user isn’t paying cold-cache penalties on ANN graph walks.

pgvector vs. Pinecone vs. Qdrant

When comparing pgvector with purpose-built vector databases like Pinecone and Qdrant, the main differences come down to integration, scalability, and operational trade-offs.

Integration with existing data

pgvector runs inside PostgreSQL, which makes it ideal for applications where vector embeddings need to be tightly coupled with relational data. Developers can store embeddings alongside structured fields, enforce constraints, and run hybrid queries in a single SQL statement. Pinecone and Qdrant operate as standalone services, requiring data synchronization pipelines if you need to combine vectors with other business data.

Indexing and query performance

All three support approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search with algorithms like HNSW. Pinecone abstracts indexing decisions and automatically optimizes for scale and performance, while Qdrant gives more direct control over index configuration. pgvector’s indexes are embedded in PostgreSQL and tuned by the database engine, which makes them simpler to manage in smaller or medium-scale workloads but less specialized for very large collections compared to dedicated vector stores.

Scalability and infrastructure

Pinecone is a fully managed cloud service designed for large-scale, low-latency vector workloads. It automatically handles sharding, replication, and scaling across regions. Qdrant, available as open source and managed SaaS, provides similar large-scale capabilities but with more deployment flexibility. pgvector inherits PostgreSQL’s scalability limits: it works well for millions of vectors, but extremely high-dimensional, billion-scale datasets usually require sharding strategies or external vector systems.

Ecosystem and use cases

pgvector is a strong choice if you want to extend an existing PostgreSQL application with vector search without adding new infrastructure. Pinecone suits enterprises that need elastic scaling and guaranteed SLAs, while Qdrant appeals to teams that want a vector-first database with strong performance for large workloads.

In short:

  • pgvector: best for integration with relational data and moderate-scale vector workloads without adding new infrastructure
  • Pinecone: best for cloud-native scaling at enterprise workloads
  • Qdrant: best for open source flexibility and large-scale deployments with full vector-first features

Related content: Read our guide to vector database open source

Key pgvector limitations

While pgvector brings vector search capabilities to PostgreSQL, it comes with notable limitations that teams should consider when evaluating it for production use. These limitations were reported by users on the G2 platform:

  • Steep learning curve for configuration: Configuring pgvector can be challenging, especially for users without deep experience in PostgreSQL or database tuning. As datasets grow more complex, adjusting parameters to maintain performance requires considerable expertise.
  • Resource-intensive setup and management: Setting up pgvector, especially building from source, demands significant time and system-level dependencies. On platforms like Windows, prerequisites such as C++ tools must be installed, which adds friction for new users or teams with limited DevOps support.
  • Scaling complexity with large datasets: As vector datasets become larger and more intricate, managing performance becomes harder. Query tuning, index configuration, and memory allocation often need manual adjustments, which can slow development and introduce operational overhead.
  • Not yet fully production-ready: pgvector is still under active development and may exhibit bugs or performance instability in some environments. It may not yet meet the reliability expectations required for mission-critical or high-availability systems.
  • Limited PostgreSQL version compatibility: pgvector only supports certain PostgreSQL versions. Users running older database instances may face compatibility issues, requiring major upgrades before adoption is possible.

Related content: Read our guide to vector database use cases

Best practices for working with pgvector

Consider the following practices when using pgvector.

1. Always benchmark with your own dataset

Although benchmarks published in documentation or community channels can provide helpful guidance, performance in real-world applications often varies significantly based on the actual data used. Factors like vector dimension, distribution, and data size play a major role in search latency and recall.

Therefore, it is essential to run your own benchmarks on a representative dataset before committing to a particular index type or database configuration. This allows you to observe how query times, index build durations, and search quality behave at your expected workload scale.

Effective benchmarking should include multiple metrics, such as recall, precision, throughput, and resource consumption, across different index parameters and query workloads. Consider automating your benchmarking and integrating it into continuous integration (CI) pipelines, so that changes to embedding models, data volume, or hardware are quickly reflected in observed performance.

2. Choose the right distance metric for your application

pgvector supports multiple similarity metrics, including L2 (Euclidean), cosine similarity, and inner product. Selecting the correct metric is critical, as it directly influences the quality of your nearest neighbor results.

For example, cosine similarity is often used for text and semantic embeddings where direction, rather than magnitude, is important. L2 distance may be preferred for numerical or image feature vectors where absolute values matter. Experimentation is necessary: test different metrics against your production queries and evaluate both performance and result relevance.

Document the rationale for your chosen metric and ensure it’s consistently applied throughout the application. Mismatched metrics can cause subtle errors or degrade user experience, especially as embedding models evolve. Set up regression tests to verify that metric changes do not accidentally degrade recall or introduce bias into search results.

3. Index wisely (HNSW vs. IVFFlat)

Choosing the right indexing strategy can dramatically impact search latency, recall, and resource overhead. HNSW is generally preferred for high-recall, low-latency queries where user experience is sensitive to search quality, though it consumes more RAM and can take longer to build.

IVFFlat offers smaller index sizes and faster builds, trading off some recall in large search spaces; it works well for periodic batch indexing or scenarios where absolute search accuracy is less critical.

Test both index types with your data, varying parameters such as lists (IVFFlat) or ef_search (HNSW) to understand trade-offs. Analyze query patterns and access frequency: if most queries target a fresh subset of data, HNSW helps, but for large, infrequently updated datasets, IVFFlat’s storage efficiency may win out.

4. Keep embeddings consistent across versions

As embedding models and preprocessing pipelines evolve, older data in your database may be encoded differently than newer records. This inconsistency can disrupt similarity search quality and make comparisons unreliable. To avoid these pitfalls, always document and version the embedding model used for every vector stored.

Ideally, persist the model version, source, and preprocessing details alongside the vector or in a related metadata field. When updating your embedding model or retraining, plan dataset migrations or batch updates to maintain vector consistency across your corpus.

Consider zero-downtime techniques, such as temporarily storing old and new vectors side by side, to validate search quality before switching production traffic. Versioning not only makes results more reliable but also aids in debugging and auditability, as you can trace query outputs to specific model states for explainability or compliance requirements.

5. Monitor query latency and tune regularly

Over time, as datasets grow and query loads fluctuate, search latency can creep up unnoticed. Routine monitoring of query performance and indexing health is critical to ensure continued, predictable behavior from pgvector.

Use PostgreSQL’s built-in monitoring features (like pg_stat_statements) as well as custom logging to track average and percentile latencies for similarity queries. Set up automated alerts for latency spikes or significant drops in recall, so you can respond before users notice degraded performance.

Regularly revisit and optimize index parameters, vacuum routines, and hardware resources based on observed workload changes. Consider archiving stale data, partitioning large tables, or offloading infrequent queries to maintainability.

Unlocking AI potential with pgvector on Instaclustr for PostgreSQL

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are transforming how businesses operate, creating a need for powerful tools to handle complex data. One of the most significant advancements in this area is the ability to perform vector similarity searches, which is essential for applications like recommendation engines, image recognition, and natural language processing. The pgvector extension for PostgreSQL brings this advanced capability directly into a familiar, trusted database environment.

Using pgvector on the Instaclustr platform unlocks the potential of data by enabling storage and query vector embeddings efficiently. This means building and scaling AI-powered features without the headache of managing a separate, specialized vector database. Instaclustr handles the complexities of database management so organizations can focus on innovation. Instaclustr is built for performance and reliability, ensuring that pgvector queries run quickly and databases remain stable, even as data and user load grow.

Adopting pgvector with Instaclustr’s Managed PostgreSQL service is simple and seamless. Instaclustr provides a production-ready, scalable environment optimized for performance. Users get the combined power of PostgreSQL’s robust, general-purpose database capabilities and pgvector’s specialized vector search functionality, all backed by expert 24/7 support. This powerful combination allows the creation of sophisticated AI applications with confidence, with a reliable, high-performance foundation.

For more information: